Mumford Cove

Environmental Monitoring

2015 - 2022

"Large, manmade changes to Earth’s climate and ecosystems are unfolding all around us. On geological time scales, their pace is unprecedented, but for humans they are incremental or barely noticeable at the backdrop of nature’s perennial fluctuations from year to year, between seasons, day and night, or even from one tide to the next. But when we record nature, when we measure its variable, dynamic states with diligence and dedication across days, years, decades, and centuries, we see the irrefutable scientific proof of longer-term, large-scale patterns.

And yet, the practice of regular environmental measurements, or monitoring, is inherently of little to no short-term benefit to the people practicing it. It is work without an immediate reward and therefore often a challenge to fund and conduct. Instead, what powers it is often just the prescient understanding of individuals or organizations that future generations will certainly have better theories, tools, models, and computers, but they will still depend on the data and measurements taken here and now."

Almost 140 years ago (in 1886), a man walked down a pier in Woods Hole (MA) and stuck a thermometer in the water. Then did so again and again, every day. The people after him kept at it, and this is why we know today how the waters around Cape Cod have warmed throughout the last century (Nixon et al. 2004).

More famously, more than 60 years ago (in 1958), Charles D. Keeling began measuring carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations on top of Hawaii’s Mauna Loa and persisted through decades of adversity and despite no apparent short-term reward. Today, Keeling’s eponymous curve – proving the inexorable, man-made rise of climate-warming CO2 in our atmosphere - stands as one of the greatest inspiring examples for the importance of environmental monitoring.

Associate Prof. Hannes Baumann

When Hannes Baumann joined the Department of Marine Sciences at the University of Connecticut Avery Point in fall 2014, he searched for a nearby field site to study and collect experimental organisms.

Mumford Cove, a little embayment nestled between a state park and a small beach community, turned out to be perfect for his research.

And because of his long-standing interest in climate change effects and previous work on environmental time-series, he immediately wanted to start a monitoring time-series, too, using his start-up funds to purchase the first temperature, pH, and oxygen loggers. The Evolutionary Fish Ecology Lab has maintained this monitoring time-series now for the past 7 years - unfunded - but true to the prescient spirit of monitoring nature today – so that later generations can reap the knowledge rewards later.

Where and what is Mumford Cove?

Map of Mumford Cove (red dot: water monitoring, red square: beach seine survey)

Mumford Cove in November 2020

A sea horse (Hippocampus erectus) caught in Mumford Cove in August 2020

Nestled between Bluff Point State Park to the west and Groton Long Point to the east, the 48 ha (~0.5 km2) small Mumford Cove (41.32°N, 72.02°W) lays where Long Island Sound opens into the Atlantic Ocean at Fisher’s Island Sound. It is a shallow embayment (~1m) with negligible freshwater input, dominated by semi-diurnal lunar tides (~0.8m) that flush through an inlet flanked by sand bars. This tidal flushing creates dynamic fluctuations of temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen conditions, which are typical for many nearshore marine habitats. Marsh grass (Spartina spp), rocky sections, and a small beach surround the Cove, while dense eelgrass (Zostera marina) covers its shallow bottom and thereby provides ideal habitat for juvenile fish, shellfish, and other marine organisms.

Mumford Cove in March 2015

Marsh grass at low tide at Mumford Cove in May 2015

Just a few decades ago, the Cove looked very different. Until 1987, a wastewater treatment plant discharged its effluent directly into it, and the turbid water covered a bottom dominated by macroalgae (Ulva spp) instead of eelgrass. After citizens forced the redirection of municipal wastewater, Mumford Cove’s eelgrass recovered, making it one of the most stunning recovery examples in Long Island Sound therefore an important site for research and conservation (Vaudrey et al. 2010). Biological and physical oceanographers from the Department of Marine Sciences have studied Mumford Cove for years, and since 2022, it has become part of the newly established Connecticut National Estuarine Research Reserve. Due to its location and unique characteristics, Mumford Cove may be an important sentinel site for documenting climate-change related shifts in species occurring in Long Island Sound.

Which parameters are measured and how?

Fig.1: Schematic section of the upper part of Mumford Cove, showing the deployed probe (blue) between the bottom anchor (grey) and a subsurface float (orange), marked by a surface float (white). The probe sits in the deepest part of the Cove (Channel), at constant 50 cm distance to the bottom, but variable water level above (red histogram).

Two Eureka Manta Sub2 probes to be swapped

Since April 2015 and as of December 2022, we recorded environmental parameters ~ 120,000 times, using battery-operated Eureka Manta Sub2 probes with temperature (°C), pH, dissolved oxygen (mg l-1, % saturation), salinity (psu), and depth (m) sensors measuring in 30 min intervals (48 measurements per day, 17,520 per year). A typical deployment for each probe lasts 4-6 weeks, after which one probe is retrieved and a new probe deployed. When in the water, the sensors are surrounded by a copper mesh guard that protects against biofouling. All probes are meticulously calibrated pre- and post-deployment, using National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) pH standards (pH4, pH7, pH10) and Ricco conductivity standards (50,000 µS/cm). Our monitoring probe is tethered vertically to a line between a bottom anchor and a sub-surface float so that the sensors are at a constant distance of 50 cm to the bottom, while the water level above the sensor varies with wind and tides (1-4m, mean 2m). A small surface float marks the sensor’s position for retrieval (Fig.1).

After retrieval, probes and sensors are cleaned, data downloaded and then subjected to quality control procedures that include pH drift correction. Data are periodically uploaded to the BCO-DMO database, where the dataset can be found under the digital object identifier 10.26008/1912/bco-dmo.659874.2. Apart from the PI, all graduate students of the Baumann Lab have helped maintain the monitoring effort throughout the years.

Do you want to see some data?

Analyses 2015-2022

Fig.2: Relative frequency distributions (bars) and cumulative frequency distributions (black lines) of (A) temperature, (B) pH, and (C) dissolved oxygen measurements in Mumford Cove. The number of valid measurements is given in each graph. The graphs allow a first, big-picture overview of the data and could be used to answer questions such as "What percentage of time is the Cove colder than 4°C (A: ~9%) or warmer than 24°C (A: ~5%)?"; What is the most common pH value (A: 8.15-8.20)?"; or "What's the chance to find the dissolved oxygen concentration somewhere between 80-120% (A: ~73%)?"

I. Overall seasonal patterns

For a first overall look at the seasonal temperature pattern, we binned the variable into 0.4°C increments (=bins) and then counted all measurements in each bin for each week of the year (across all years). These absolute numbers were then transformed into percentages for each week (each week sums up to 100%). Finally, we used a spatial interpolation procedure called 'kriging' to calculate the contours that are plotted in Fig.3.

This revealed that the median low temperature (3.7°C) occurred in week 7 (mid-February), while the median high temperature (24.0°C) occurred in week 34 (end of August). We found that over the past 7 years, temperatures at the end of January (week 5) were regularly as low as 0°C or as high 7°C; however, the warm colors in Fig.3 indicate that the most probable variability was much smaller variability (3-5°C). A total of 184 temperature measurements (0.2%) were actually negative, with the minimum of -1.7°C recorded on January 30th 2021 at 5:00 AM. Conversely, summer temperatures between 21-27°C were common, but the most probable range was 23-25°C. 300 measurements (0.3%) were higher than 27°C, with the maximum of 29.0°C recorded on August 14th 2016 at 5:30 PM.

Overall, this shallow New England Cove shows the typically large seasonality of nearshore habitats in North-American temperate latitudes (Baumann & Doherty 2013; Baumann et al. 2015). Sessile organisms (e.g. shellfish) are therefore highly temperature-tolerant, while the majority of fish species occur here only in spring, summer, and fall.

Fig.3: Probabilistic overview of seasonal temperature conditions in Mumford Cove based on 119,884 measurements between April 2015 – December 2022. Contours show the percentage of values in each week × 0.4°C grid cell interpolated by kriging (each week sums to 100%). Solid black lines depict 5th, 25th, 50th (empty circels), 75th, and 95th percentiles. Grey circles show the number of weekly observations.

In a similar way, we looked at the overall seasonal pH conditions in Mumford Cove. Again, the pH-values were binned (pH 0.05 increments), counted within each bin and week of the year (across all years) and then expressed as percentages for each week (each week sums up to 100%). Kriging was again used to derive the spatial interpolation contours plotted in Fig.4.

We found that the median seasonal pH maximum (8.38) occurred in week 8 (end of February), while the median seasonal pH minimum (7.86) occurred in week 36 (early September). In other words, every year the system experiences a steady, 6 months decline in average pH conditions. The fact that the warmest colors are concentrated in the winter months means that weekly pH variability is lowest in winter, whereas pH conditions are more variable in summer. Summer pH lows of 7.6 were not uncommon; however, the most probable summer pH values ranged from 7.8 - 8.0. A total of 120 pH measurements (0.1%) were below pH 7.4, with the overall minimum of 7.13 recorded on July 19th 2021 at 9:00 AM. Conversely, pH highs during winter commonly exceeded 8.5, but the most probable range of pH values was 8.2 - 8.4. A total of 356 pH measurements (0.3%) were higher than 8.9, with the overall pH maximum of 9.10 recorded on July 23rd 2018 at 7:30 PM.

Overall, during the past 7 years, we find a clear pattern of a mid- to late summer pH depression, which is typical for productive nearshore habitats, where respiration and therefore metabolic CO2 production and acidification peak during summer (Wootton et al. 2008, Melzner et al. 2012, Gobler and Baumann 2016). However, compared to other embayments on Long Island Sound and other temperate salt marsh habitats, the seasonal pH depressions were less extreme and the metabolic acidification during summer rather subdued. On the other hand, the pH highs were considerably above open ocean conditions. This is likely a consequence of the extensive subaquatic vegetation in Mumford Cove, i.e., the eelgrass that can take up substantial amounts of CO2 during the photosynthetic time of the day and thereby increase the pH (Baumann et al. 2015).

Fig.4: Probabilistic overview of seasonal pH conditions in Mumford Cove based on 114,631 measurements between April 2015 – December 2022. Contours show the percentage of values in each week × 0.05 pH grid cell interpolated by kriging (each week sums to 100%). Solid black lines depict 5th, 25th, 50th (empty circels), 75th, and 95th percentiles. Grey circles show the number of weekly observations.

Now let's look at the overall seasonal pattern in dissolved oxygen (DO) conditions, which we express as percent saturation (%) to make measurements comparable across different temperature conditions (seasons) and because this is biologically more meaningful than absolute CO oxygen concentrations (in absolute terms, cold water holds more dissolved oxygen than warm water). Oxygen values were binned (5% increments), counted within each bin and week of the year (across all years) and then expressed as percentages for each week (each week sums up to 100%). Kriging was again used to derive the spatial interpolation contours plotted in Fig.5.

We found that the median seasonal DO maximum (113%) occurred in week 20 (mid-May), while the median seasonal DO minimum (83%) occurred in week 36 (early September), which is the same week that the seasonal pH minimum occurred (Fig.4). The warmest colors here indicate a strong concentration of values (~90 - 110%) around the median in fall, winter, and early spring. In late spring, summer, and early fall, on the other hand, the diel and weekly variability in DO was much greater, commonly exhibiting fluctuations between 80 - 120% saturation. It seems particularly noteworthy that extreme DO supersaturation of >140% was common in Mumford Cove during May, June and July. In fact, 205 measurements (0.2%) were higher than 170% saturation, with the maximum of 214% recorded on June 24th at 7:30 PM. Low oxygen conditions of <60% did occur in the Cove, predominantly in July and August, but they were not very frequent or particularly extreme. In total, we recorded only 234 measurements (0.2%) of <20% DO saturation.

Overall, we find an intriguing seasonal DO pattern in Mumford Cove that is related but not identical to the seasonal pH pattern. This would be expected, if ecosystem metabolism would be the sole driver here. When the respiration of organisms - from bacteria to plants and fish - dominates, this is called net heterotrophy, oxygen is depleted and CO2 produced, the latter resulting in reduced pH. When the photosynthetic organisms consume CO2 while producing oxygen during the day, a cove could temporarily shift to net autotrophy, increasing oxygen and pH (Gobler and Baumann 2016). This is also generally true in Mumford, but on a seasonal basis the pH decline starts months before DO begins to decline as well. In addition, we saw only mild seasonal undersaturation but frequent, widespread, and often extreme oxygen supersaturation in Mumford Cove, which we suspect is due to its large subaquatic vegetation, specifically its eelgrass meadow. Simply put, the pH and oxygen patterns in Mumford Cove suggest that these plants ameliorate extreme short-term acidification and hypoxia that often characterizes other coastal system without such vegetation (Cloern et al. 2016, Breitburg et al. 2019).

Fig.5: Probabilistic overview of seasonal dissolved oxygen conditions in Mumford Cove based on 113,590 measurements between April 2015 – December 2022. Contours show the percentage of values in each week × 5% DO grid cell interpolated by kriging (each week sums to 100%). Solid black lines depict 5th, 25th, 50th (empty circels), 75th, and 95th percentiles. Grey circles show the number of weekly observations.

II. Diel and tidal variability

With the probe hanging suspended ~ 50 cm above the bottom of Mumford Cove, the depth sensor records the water level fluctuations above it. It provides a great glimpse of how dynamic a habitat the Cove really is. We see the clear 12h periodicity of the tides and that the first tide is always more extreme than the second one, although the difference between the two changes with the moon phases and prevailing wind conditions. The full moon tides are more extreme than the new moon tides. As shown in Fig.1, there's generally between 1-3m of water above the sensor; only in the most extreme events (think storm floods) values of 3-4m have been observed.

Fig.6: Diel and tidal water level fluctuations in Mumford Cove during one month (July/August 2019). White circles = full moon, black circle = new moon. Plotted values are the water depth above the sensor - the total water depth is +0.5m.


Fig.7: Monthly averages of diel temperature (red), pH (green), and dissolved oxygen fluctuations (blue).

"In this dynamic environment, it is no wonder that temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen conditions also show large fluctuation on diel and tidal cycles."

For a first general look, we located and then subtracted the minimum from the maximum value of each parameter for every day of the time series. Then we averaged all these values by month across all years, which is shown in Fig.7. We found average diel temperature ranges of <2°C between September - February, but larger diel temperature fluctuations up to 3°C between March and August. The largest diel temperature change on record occurred on May 17th 2015 (6.6°C), while the smallest diel temperature change occurred in 2018 on the day before Christmas (0.1°C, December 24th). Still, because of the high specific heat of water (it resists heating and cooling), diel temperature fluctuations are approximately one order of magnitude below the seasonal temperature change in Mumford Cove.

In contrast, diel pH and dissolved oxygen fluctuations swings were much larger, meaning that they were often of similar magnitude than the overall seasonal pattern. Between June - September, diel pH fluctuations averaged (!) ~0.36 pH units, and they still averaged ~0.18 pH units daily in winter and early spring (December - March) . The smallest and largest diel pH fluctuations occurred on December 20th 2020 (8.26 - 8.29, 0.03 pH units) and on September 20th 2018 (pH 7.42 - 9.01, 1.59 pH units!), respectively.

On average, dissolved oxygen conditions varied by more than 60% daily during summer months (June - August) and by ~20% daily during winter and early spring (December - March). The smallest and largest diel DO fluctuations occurred on December 17th 2020 (98 - 102%) and on June 12th 2017 (48 - 196%), respectively. Note that the average diel maxima are reached in May for temperature (likely because the day/night difference in air temperature is greatest then), but 2-3 months later for pH and DO (because that's when the biological productivity is greatest).



Here, in Fig.7 we show a few representative examples of diel and tidal temperature (A,B), pH (C,D), and DO fluctuations (E,F) over the course of 7 days.

When temperature fluctuations are large - as shown here for 13 - 20 May 2015, the tidal signal is very clear, because the shallow cove warms during low tide and then cools down again when the new high tide arrives.

In contrast, the day/night and tidal signal is less clear for the shown pH fluctuations between 12-19 October 2018.

However, the plotted diel DO fluctuations between 18 - 25 June 2017 show are clear day (high DO %) vs. night (low DO %) signal and perhaps a small tidal signal as well. In reality, DO conditions tend to reach their minimum at sunrise, while maxima are observed predominantly at the time of sunset.

III. Interannual variability

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.

Fig.9: Seasonal and inter-annual variability of temperature (red), pH (green), and dissolved oxygen conditions in Mumford Cove between April 2015 and December 2022. Colored circles show weekly means, while small grey circles show weekly anomalies (year-specific weekly mean - overall weekly mean). Thick lines represent weekly anomalies smoothed with non-parametric Loess smoother (20% bandwidth), also shown again in Fig.10.

Hannes recovering the probe, which hangs just below the round subsurface float

On 20 Jan 2023, graduate student Lucas Jones maneuvers the "Zostera" through the shallow waters of Mumford Cove

Fig.10: Loess-smoothed trend lines from Fig.9, showing no monotonous increases or decreases in temperature, pH, and DO conditions

New battery pack
The new battery pack allows the probe to continuously record data every 30 minutes for over six weeks

David Riser cleaning the biofouling on the floats

Charlie Woods helps Hannes retrieving the pH/DO/temp probe beneath the subsurface float after being deployed for six weeks


  • Baumann H, Doherty O (2013) Decadal changes in the world's coastal latitudinal temperature gradients. PLoS ONE 8:e67596
  • Baumann H, Wallace R, Tagliaferri T, Gobler CJ (2015) Large natural pH, CO2 and O2 fluctuations in a temperate tidal salt marsh on diel, seasonal and interannual time scales. Estuar Coasts 38:220–231
  • Breitburg DL, Baumann H, Sokolova IM, Frieder CA (2019) Chapter 6. Multiple stressors – forces that combine to worsen deoxygenation and its effects. In: Ocean deoxygenation: everyone’s problem. Causes, impacts, consequences and solutions. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Report xxii, 562p.
  • Cloern JE, Abreu PC, Carstensen J, Chauvaud L, Elmgren R, Grall J, Greening H, Johansson JOR, Kahru M, Sherwood ET (2016) Human activities and climate variability drive fast‐paced change across the world's estuarine–coastal ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 22:513–529
  • Gobler CJ, Baumann H (2016) Hypoxia and acidification in marine ecosystems: Coupled dynamics and effects on ocean life. Biol Lett 12:20150976
  • Melzner F, Thomsen J, Koeve W, Oschlies A, Gutowska M, Bange H, Hansen H, Körtzinger A (2012) Future ocean acidification will be amplified by hypoxia in coastal habitats. Mar Biol 160:1875-1888
  • Nixon SW, Granger S, Buckley BA, Lamont M, Rowell B (2004) A one hundred and seventeen year coastal water temperature record from Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Estuaries 27:397-404
  • Vaudrey JM, Kremer JN, Branco BF, Short FT (2010) Eelgrass recovery after nutrient enrichment reversal. Aquat Bot 93:237-243
  • Wootton JT, Pfister CA, Forester JD (2008) Dynamic patterns and ecological impacts of declining ocean pH in a high-resolution multi-year dataset. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18848–18853

A panorama of Mumford Cove from the South on 6 June 2016. To left, the cove is part of the Bluff Point State Park.